Regressing structure function against bin separation - Revision history

Yuengdjern at 15:53, 30 May 2022

2022-05-30T15:53:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:53, 30 May 2022
Line 8:		Line 8:
	== Bin-centered difference scheme regression ==		== Bin-centered difference scheme regression ==
	<div class="mw-collapsible" id="Bin-center-diff regression" data-collapsetext="Collapse" data-expandtext="Expand">		<div class="mw-collapsible" id="Bin-center-diff regression" data-collapsetext="Collapse" data-expandtext="Expand">
	# If <math>D_{ll}(n,\delta)</math> was evaluated using a bin-centered difference scheme, the regression is usually done for each bin individually, with a single <math>D(n, \delta)</math> for each separation distance, ultimately yielding an <math>\varepsilon</math> for each bin~~; or~~		# If <math>D_{ll}(n,\delta)</math> was evaluated using a bin-centered difference scheme, the regression is usually done for each bin individually, with a single <math>D(n, \delta)</math> for each separation distance, ultimately yielding an <math>\varepsilon</math> for each bin.
	</div>		</div>

Yuengdjern at 15:53, 30 May 2022

2022-05-30T15:53:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:53, 30 May 2022
Line 8:		Line 8:
	== Bin-centered difference scheme regression ==		== Bin-centered difference scheme regression ==
	<div class="mw-collapsible" id="Bin-center-diff regression" data-collapsetext="Collapse" data-expandtext="Expand">		<div class="mw-collapsible" id="Bin-center-diff regression" data-collapsetext="Collapse" data-expandtext="Expand">
	# If <math>D_{ll}(n,\delta)</math> was evaluated using a bin-centered difference scheme, the regression ~~can either be~~ done:		# If <math>D_{ll}(n,\delta)</math> was evaluated using a bin-centered difference scheme, the regression is usually done for each bin individually, with a single <math>D(n, \delta)</math> for each separation distance, ultimately yielding an <math>\varepsilon</math> for each bin; or
	#* for each bin individually, with a single <math>D(n, \delta)</math> for each separation distance, ultimately yielding an <math>\varepsilon</math> for each bin; or
	#* by combining the data for all of the bins, with each separation distance having a <math>D_{ll}(n, \delta)</math> value for each bin, with the regression again ultimately yielding a single <math>\varepsilon</math> value for the data segment.
	</div>		</div>

Yuengdjern at 10:47, 10 December 2021

2021-12-10T10:47:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:47, 10 December 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	How the regressions are set up depends on the choice of differencing scheme, these are explained below~~. Also, the most common choice of fitting method is recommended as best practice, but alternatives do exist~~.		How the regressions are set up depends on the choice of differencing scheme, these are explained below.

	== Forward-difference scheme regression ==		== Forward-difference scheme regression ==
Line 13:		Line 13:
	</div>		</div>

	~~== Least-squares fit ==~~
	~~<div class="mw-collapsible" id="Least-square" data-collapsetext="Collapse" data-expandtext="Expand">~~
	# The regression is typically done as a least-squares fit, either as: <br /><br /> <math>D_{ll} = a_0 + a_1 (\delta r_0)^{2/3}</math>; or as <br /> <math>D_{ll} = a_0 + a_1 (\delta r_0)^{2/3}+a_3((\delta r_0)^{2/3})^3 </math> <br /><br /> the former being the [[canonical structure function method \| canonical method]] that excludes non-turbulent velocity differences between bins, whereas the latter is a [[modified structure function method \| modified method]] that includes non-turbulent velocity differences between bins due to any oscillatory signal (e.g. surface waves, motion of the ADCP on a mooring).
	~~</div>~~

	----		----
	Back to [[Processing your ADCP data using structure function techniques \| Compute structure functions and dissipation estimates]]<br></br>		Back to [[Processing your ADCP data using structure function techniques \| Compute structure functions and dissipation estimates]]<br></br>
	[[Category:Velocity profilers]]		[[Category:Velocity profilers]]

CynthiaBluteau at 16:04, 23 November 2021

2021-11-23T16:04:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:04, 23 November 2021
Line 18:		Line 18:
	</div>		</div>

			----
	Back to [[Processing your ADCP data using structure function techniques \| Compute structure functions and dissipation estimates]]<br></br>		Back to [[Processing your ADCP data using structure function techniques \| Compute structure functions and dissipation estimates]]<br></br>
			[[Category:Velocity profilers]]

Yuengdjern at 09:38, 16 November 2021

2021-11-16T09:38:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:38, 16 November 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	How the regressions are set up depends on the choice of differencing scheme. ~~Then~~ the most common choice of fitting method is recommended as best practice, but alternatives do exist.		How the regressions are set up depends on the choice of differencing scheme, these are explained below. Also, the most common choice of fitting method is recommended as best practice, but alternatives do exist.

	== Forward-difference scheme regression ==		== Forward-difference scheme regression ==

Yuengdjern: Created page with "How the regressions are set up depends on the choice of differencing scheme. Then the most common choice of fitting method is recommended as best practice, but alternatives d..."

2021-11-15T16:35:09Z

Created page with "How the regressions are set up depends on the choice of differencing scheme. Then the most common choice of fitting method is recommended as best practice, but alternatives d..."

New page

How the regressions are set up depends on the choice of differencing scheme. Then the most common choice of fitting method is recommended as best practice, but alternatives do exist.

== Forward-difference scheme regression ==
<div class="mw-collapsible" id="fw-diff regress" data-collapsetext="Collapse" data-expandtext="Expand">
# If <math>D_{ll}(n,\delta)</math> was evaluated using a forward-difference scheme, the regression is done for the combined data from all bins in the selected range, hence the maximum number of <math>D_{ll}(n, \delta)</math> values for each separation distance will be the number of bins in the range less 1 for <math>\delta</math> = 1, reducing by 1 for each increment in <math>\delta</math>, with the regression ultimately yielding a single <math>\varepsilon</math> value for the data segment
</div>

== Bin-centered difference scheme regression ==
<div class="mw-collapsible" id="Bin-center-diff regression" data-collapsetext="Collapse" data-expandtext="Expand">
# If <math>D_{ll}(n,\delta)</math> was evaluated using a bin-centered difference scheme, the regression can either be done:
#* for each bin individually, with a single <math>D(n, \delta)</math> for each separation distance, ultimately yielding an <math>\varepsilon</math> for each bin; or
#* by combining the data for all of the bins, with each separation distance having a <math>D_{ll}(n, \delta)</math> value for each bin, with the regression again ultimately yielding a single <math>\varepsilon</math> value for the data segment.
</div>

== Least-squares fit ==
<div class="mw-collapsible" id="Least-square" data-collapsetext="Collapse" data-expandtext="Expand">
# The regression is typically done as a least-squares fit, either as: <br /><br /> <math>D_{ll} = a_0 + a_1 (\delta r_0)^{2/3}</math>; or as <br /> <math>D_{ll} = a_0 + a_1 (\delta r_0)^{2/3}+a_3((\delta r_0)^{2/3})^3 </math> <br /><br /> the former being the [[canonical structure function method | canonical method]] that excludes non-turbulent velocity differences between bins, whereas the latter is a [[modified structure function method | modified method]] that includes non-turbulent velocity differences between bins due to any oscillatory signal (e.g. surface waves, motion of the ADCP on a mooring).
</div>

Back to [[Processing your ADCP data using structure function techniques | Compute structure functions and dissipation estimates]]<br></br>