Talk:Shear probes: Difference between revisions

From Atomix
Yuengdjern (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Aleboyer (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Fixed it, you need to use #* instead of only * for the sub-numbering. And #:* if text should be a bit further to the right. But the boxes are gone now...
== Appearance shear group welcome page ==
--[[User:KikiSchulz|KikiSchulz]] ([[User talk:KikiSchulz|talk]]) 12:09, 7 May 2021 (CEST)  
* I changed the layout to also have pictures. It looked poorly before, but the images do not really have a meaning - so I am fine with changing it back again if the group prefers. [[User:KikiSchulz|KikiSchulz]] ([[User talk:KikiSchulz|talk]]) 22:40, 9 November 2021 (CET)
*The pictures idea is interesting. It should be discussed among all groups. We want to keep the format the same for each group. I added the "Scope" title yesterday to match the other groups. Regarding the material of the scope section, they are using the "bullet" style. We should keep it this way and change if all 3 groups agrees [[User:Aleboyer|Aleboyer]].


Testing the discussion: There is an issue with the numbering, it is reset after adding subsections. I will try to fit it :)
== Older version comments ==
--[[User:KikiSchulz|KikiSchulz]] ([[User talk:KikiSchulz|talk]]) 11:59, 7 May 2021 (CEST)
Outdated. Removed [[User:Ilker|Ilker]] ([[User talk:Ilker|talk]]) 17:04, 10 November 2021 (CET)
 
Removed link/reference to turbulence shear spectra: There [[here]] page is currently acting as a repository of information about shear spectra and will be eventually transferred to concepts and fundamentals.  So am removing the links for now.
--[[User:YuengLenn|YuengLenn]] ([[User talk:YuengLenn|talk]]) 13:53, 7 May 2021 (UCT)

Latest revision as of 16:13, 10 November 2021

Appearance shear group welcome page

  • I changed the layout to also have pictures. It looked poorly before, but the images do not really have a meaning - so I am fine with changing it back again if the group prefers. KikiSchulz (talk) 22:40, 9 November 2021 (CET)
  • The pictures idea is interesting. It should be discussed among all groups. We want to keep the format the same for each group. I added the "Scope" title yesterday to match the other groups. Regarding the material of the scope section, they are using the "bullet" style. We should keep it this way and change if all 3 groups agrees Aleboyer.

Older version comments

Outdated. Removed Ilker (talk) 17:04, 10 November 2021 (CET)