Talk:Velocity inertial subrange model: Difference between revisions
From Atomix
→Required additions: new section |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* Consider removing the word equilibrium range. This may be confusing to some ppl since the viscous subrange isn't in equilibrium. Perhaps label the 3x subranges (energy or production subrange, inertial, and viscous)? Have the labels match up with the conventions for math vars [[Nomenclature]] [[User:CynthiaBluteau|CynthiaBluteau]] ([[User talk:CynthiaBluteau|talk]]) 01:30, 11 November 2021 (CET) | * Consider removing the word equilibrium range. This may be confusing to some ppl since the viscous subrange isn't in equilibrium. Perhaps label the 3x subranges (energy or production subrange, inertial, and viscous)? Have the labels match up with the conventions for math vars [[Nomenclature]] [[User:CynthiaBluteau|CynthiaBluteau]] ([[User talk:CynthiaBluteau|talk]]) 01:30, 11 November 2021 (CET) | ||
Latest revision as of 21:56, 11 November 2021
Suggestion for figure
- Consider removing the word equilibrium range. This may be confusing to some ppl since the viscous subrange isn't in equilibrium. Perhaps label the 3x subranges (energy or production subrange, inertial, and viscous)? Have the labels match up with the conventions for math vars Nomenclature CynthiaBluteau (talk) 01:30, 11 November 2021 (CET)
