Quality control measures: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 22:15, 5 May 2026

Some elements of quality control can only be done after spectra have been computed and should be done before final estimates of $ε$ are reported:

Reject time series segments as inadequate for turbulence analysis
- List them here or link to new pages?
Reject spectra (or parts of spectra)
- Spectral slope of fitted spectral observations (?)
- Misfit criteria

Identify frame interferences from the epsilon vales
Plot spectra from all three velocity components to check for Large-scale turbulence anisotropy
Determine the measurement noise levels in the time-domain This is currently not implemented, would be best done on each segments at level 2

Here are other quality indicators based on the estimated $ε$ :

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 ** List them here or link to new pages?
 * Reject spectra (or parts of spectra)
+** Spectral slope of fitted spectral observations (?)
+** Misfit criteria
 * Identify frame interferences from the epsilon vales
-* Plot spectra from all three velocity components to check for large-scale anisotropy
+* Plot spectra from all three velocity components to check for [[Large-scale turbulence anisotropy]]
+* Determine the measurement noise levels in the time-domain {{FontColor|fg=white|bg=red|text=This is currently not implemented, would be best done on each segments at level 2}}
-Here's another list of various quality indicators based on the estimated <math>\varepsilon</math>:
-#* Anisotropy
-#* Spectral slope of fitted spectral observations (?)
-#* Misfit criteria
-#* Propagated error from the confidence level of the spectra
+Here are other quality indicators based on the estimated <math>\varepsilon</math>:
+* Propagated error from the confidence level of the spectra
+-----
+Return to [[Spectral estimates and identifying the inertial subrange]]
 [[Category:Velocity point-measurements]]