Spectral estimates and identifying the inertial subrange: Difference between revisions
From Atomix
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* [[Spectral computations]] and identify the appropriate [[Velocity inertial subrange model|inertial subrange model]] (e.g., surface wave considerations) | * [[Spectral computations]] and identify the appropriate [[Velocity inertial subrange model|inertial subrange model]] (e.g., surface wave considerations) | ||
* [[Estimate epsilon|estimated <math>\varepsilon</math>]] using stats | * [[Estimate epsilon|estimated <math>\varepsilon</math>]] using stats | ||
----- | |||
Return to [[Preparing quality-controlled velocities]] | |||
Continue to [[Quality control measures|Quality control measures for <math>\varepsilon</math>]] | |||
Latest revision as of 22:29, 5 March 2022
This is a placeholder that could list processing steps applied from level 2 to level 3, i.e. computing spectra and identifying whether there's an inertial subrange at all... We could perhaps drag in estimating epsilon from the spectra too here.
- Spectral computations and identify the appropriate inertial subrange model (e.g., surface wave considerations)
- estimated [math]\displaystyle{ \varepsilon }[/math] using stats
Return to Preparing quality-controlled velocities
Continue to Quality control measures for [math]\displaystyle{ \varepsilon }[/math]
