Talk:Flow chart for shear probes: Difference between revisions

From Atomix
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
Other comment: could we get rid of some 'shear probes' in the subheadings? It is unnecessary, repetative and makes the table of content ugly because it is long. [[User:KikiSchulz|KikiSchulz]] ([[User talk:KikiSchulz|talk]]) 15:44, 9 November 2021 (CET)[[User:Ilker|Ilker]] ([[User talk:Ilker|talk]]) 16:09, 9 November 2021 (CET)Agreed
Other comment: could we get rid of some 'shear probes' in the subheadings? It is unnecessary, repetative and makes the table of content ugly because it is long. [[User:KikiSchulz|KikiSchulz]] ([[User talk:KikiSchulz|talk]]) 15:44, 9 November 2021 (CET)[[User:Ilker|Ilker]] ([[User talk:Ilker|talk]]) 16:09, 9 November 2021 (CET)Agreed


[[User:Ilker|Ilker]] ([[User talk:Ilker|talk]]) 16:09, 9 November 2021 (CET) We need a "Determine the temperature of the water" page and a brieft description why we need it (calculation of viscosity) and how we measure (FP07- beware drift; precision T sensor, or just assume a reasonable value for the environment).
[[User:Ilker|Ilker]] ([[User talk:Ilker|talk]]) 16:09, 9 November 2021 (CET) We need a "Determine the temperature of the water" page and a brief description why we need it (calculation of viscosity) and how we measure (FP07- beware drift; precision T sensor, or just assume a reasonable value for the environment).
 
Coherent-vibration removal: more details can be included, e.g. the need for long segments for cross-spectral analysis and other recommendations [[User:Ilker|Ilker]] ([[User talk:Ilker|talk]]) 21:14, 9 November 2021 (CET)

Revision as of 20:14, 9 November 2021

Step 2: Shall we change the term "Profile"? (--Aleboyer (talk) 14:00, 25 June 2021 (CEST))

Re: Arnaud - I think we settled this section (includes profile but more general) and segment (for one diss rate estimate) thing - so no ;) KikiSchulz (talk) 15:44, 9 November 2021 (CET)

Other comment: could we get rid of some 'shear probes' in the subheadings? It is unnecessary, repetative and makes the table of content ugly because it is long. KikiSchulz (talk) 15:44, 9 November 2021 (CET)Ilker (talk) 16:09, 9 November 2021 (CET)Agreed

Ilker (talk) 16:09, 9 November 2021 (CET) We need a "Determine the temperature of the water" page and a brief description why we need it (calculation of viscosity) and how we measure (FP07- beware drift; precision T sensor, or just assume a reasonable value for the environment).

Coherent-vibration removal: more details can be included, e.g. the need for long segments for cross-spectral analysis and other recommendations Ilker (talk) 21:14, 9 November 2021 (CET)