Talk:Velocity inertial subrange model: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 00:30, 11 November 2021

Consider removing the word equilibrium range, this is a bit confusing for some users. I don't consider the viscous subrange to be in equilibrium, while I often use the work energy-containing range for the lowest frequency. I'd just label the 3x subranges, and we can amend the description for the theory of the inertial subrange. CynthiaBluteau (talk) 01:30, 11 November 2021 (CET)

Revision as of 00:29, 11 November 2021 view source CynthiaBluteau (talk \| contribs) 2,846 edits →‎Suggestions for figure: new section		Revision as of 00:30, 11 November 2021 view source CynthiaBluteau (talk \| contribs) 2,846 edits mNo edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Suggestions for figure ==		== Suggestions for figure ==

	* ~~I'd remove~~ the word equilibrium range, this is a bit confusing for some users. I don't consider the viscous subrange to be in equilibrium, while I often use the work energy-containing range for the lowest frequency. I'd just label the 3x subranges, and we can amend the description for the theory of the inertial subrange		* Consider removing the word equilibrium range, this is a bit confusing for some users. I don't consider the viscous subrange to be in equilibrium, while I often use the work energy-containing range for the lowest frequency. I'd just label the 3x subranges, and we can amend the description for the theory of the inertial subrange. [[User:CynthiaBluteau\|CynthiaBluteau]] ([[User talk:CynthiaBluteau\|talk]]) 01:30, 11 November 2021 (CET)