Wavenumber response of the shear probe: Difference between revisions
From Atomix
Created page with "The probe-response correction depends on the dimensions of the shear probe. For a commonly used shear probe the spectrum is corrected for the spatial averaging of the shear pr..." |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The probe-response correction depends on the dimensions of the shear probe. For a commonly used shear probe the spectrum is corrected for the spatial averaging of the shear probe by multiplying it by the factor correction <math>1+\left( \frac{k}{k_0} \right)^2</math> where <math>k_0</math> = 50 cpm and <math>k</math> is the wavenumber expressed in units of cpm | The probe-response correction depends on the dimensions of the shear probe. For a commonly used shear probe the spectrum is corrected for the spatial averaging of the shear probe by multiplying it by the factor correction <math>1+\left( \frac{k}{k_0} \right)^2</math> where <math>k_0</math> = 50 cpm and <math>k</math> is the wavenumber expressed in units of cpm <ref>Macoun, P., & Lueck, R. (2004). Modeling the spatial response of the airfoil shear probe using different sized probes. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 21(2), 284-297.</ref>. The correction reaches a factor of 10 at a wavenumber of 150 cpm, and it is not recommended to use spectral data beyond this wavenumber unless the probe is small and <math>k_0</math> is larger than 50 cpm. | ||
==References== | |||
<references /> | |||
Revision as of 16:08, 5 October 2021
The probe-response correction depends on the dimensions of the shear probe. For a commonly used shear probe the spectrum is corrected for the spatial averaging of the shear probe by multiplying it by the factor correction where = 50 cpm and is the wavenumber expressed in units of cpm [1]. The correction reaches a factor of 10 at a wavenumber of 150 cpm, and it is not recommended to use spectral data beyond this wavenumber unless the probe is small and is larger than 50 cpm.
References
- ↑ Macoun, P., & Lueck, R. (2004). Modeling the spatial response of the airfoil shear probe using different sized probes. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 21(2), 284-297.
