Estimate epsilon: Difference between revisions

From Atomix
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
# Establish the most [[Identify the inertial subrange|likely wavenumber range]] for the [[Velocity inertial subrange model|inertial subrange]]
# Establish the most [[Identify the inertial subrange|likely wavenumber range]] for the [[Velocity inertial subrange model|inertial subrange]]
# [[Spectral fitting|Fit the spectrum]] of all three velocity components with the appropriate  [[Velocity inertial subrange model|inertial subrange model]]
# [[Spectral fitting|Fit the spectrum]] of all three velocity components with the appropriate  [[Velocity inertial subrange model|inertial subrange model]]
# Compute various quality statistics based on the estimated <math>\varepsilon</math>:
# Compute various quality indicators based on the estimated <math>\varepsilon</math>:
#* Anisotropy
#* Anisotropy
#* Spectral slope of fitted spectral observations (?)
#* Spectral slope of fitted spectral observations (?)

Revision as of 20:36, 29 October 2021

Once the spatial-spectral estimates have been computed, the following steps are recommended for obtaining epsilon:

  1. Establish the most likely wavenumber range for the inertial subrange
  2. Fit the spectrum of all three velocity components with the appropriate inertial subrange model
  3. Compute various quality indicators based on the estimated [math]\displaystyle{ \varepsilon }[/math]:
    • Anisotropy
    • Spectral slope of fitted spectral observations (?)
    • Misfit criteria
    • Propagated error from the confidence level of the spectra