Estimate epsilon: Difference between revisions
From Atomix
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
# Establish the most [[Identify the inertial subrange|likely wavenumber range]] for the [[Velocity inertial subrange model|inertial subrange]] | # Establish the most [[Identify the inertial subrange|likely wavenumber range]] for the [[Velocity inertial subrange model|inertial subrange]] | ||
# [[Spectral fitting|Fit the spectrum]] of all three velocity components with the appropriate [[Velocity inertial subrange model|inertial subrange model]] | # [[Spectral fitting|Fit the spectrum]] of all three velocity components with the appropriate [[Velocity inertial subrange model|inertial subrange model]] | ||
# Compute various quality indicators based on the estimated <math>\varepsilon</math>: | # Compute various [[Quality control measures|quality indicators]] based on the estimated <math>\varepsilon</math>: | ||
#* Anisotropy | #* Anisotropy | ||
#* Spectral slope of fitted spectral observations (?) | #* Spectral slope of fitted spectral observations (?) | ||
Revision as of 23:27, 29 October 2021
Once the spatial-spectral estimates have been computed, the following steps are recommended for obtaining epsilon:
- Establish the most likely wavenumber range for the inertial subrange
- Fit the spectrum of all three velocity components with the appropriate inertial subrange model
- Compute various quality indicators based on the estimated [math]\displaystyle{ \varepsilon }[/math]:
- Anisotropy
- Spectral slope of fitted spectral observations (?)
- Misfit criteria
- Propagated error from the confidence level of the spectra
