Quality control measures: Difference between revisions
From Atomix
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
** List them here or link to new pages? | ** List them here or link to new pages? | ||
* Reject spectra (or parts of spectra) | * Reject spectra (or parts of spectra) | ||
** Spectral slope of fitted spectral observations (?) | |||
** Misfit criteria | |||
* Identify frame interferences from the epsilon vales | * Identify frame interferences from the epsilon vales | ||
* Plot spectra from all three velocity components to check for large-scale anisotropy | * Plot spectra from all three velocity components to check for large-scale anisotropy | ||
| Line 9: | Line 12: | ||
Here | Here are other quality indicators based on the estimated <math>\varepsilon</math>: | ||
* Propagated error from the confidence level of the spectra | * Propagated error from the confidence level of the spectra | ||
[[Category:Velocity point-measurements]] | [[Category:Velocity point-measurements]] | ||
Revision as of 23:32, 29 October 2021
Some elements of quality control can only be done after spectra have been computed and should be done before final estimates of [math]\displaystyle{ \varepsilon }[/math] are reported:
- Reject time series segments as inadequate for turbulence analysis
- List them here or link to new pages?
- Reject spectra (or parts of spectra)
- Spectral slope of fitted spectral observations (?)
- Misfit criteria
- Identify frame interferences from the epsilon vales
- Plot spectra from all three velocity components to check for large-scale anisotropy
Here are other quality indicators based on the estimated [math]\displaystyle{ \varepsilon }[/math]:
- Propagated error from the confidence level of the spectra
