Talk:Flow chart for shear probes: Difference between revisions

From Atomix
Aleboyer (talk | contribs)
Created page with "Step 2: Shall we change the term "Profile"? (--~~~~)"
 
KikiSchulz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Step 2: Shall we change the term "Profile"? (--[[User:Aleboyer|Aleboyer]] ([[User talk:Aleboyer|talk]]) 14:00, 25 June 2021 (CEST))
Step 2: Shall we change the term "Profile"? (--[[User:Aleboyer|Aleboyer]] ([[User talk:Aleboyer|talk]]) 14:00, 25 June 2021 (CEST))
Re: Arnaud - I think we settled this section (includes profile but more general) and segment (for one diss rate estimate) thing - so no ;) [[User:KikiSchulz|KikiSchulz]] ([[User talk:KikiSchulz|talk]]) 15:44, 9 November 2021 (CET)
Other comment: could we get rid of some 'shear probes' in the subheadings? It is unnecessary, repetative and makes the table of content ugly because it is long. [[User:KikiSchulz|KikiSchulz]] ([[User talk:KikiSchulz|talk]]) 15:44, 9 November 2021 (CET)

Revision as of 14:44, 9 November 2021

Step 2: Shall we change the term "Profile"? (--Aleboyer (talk) 14:00, 25 June 2021 (CEST))

Re: Arnaud - I think we settled this section (includes profile but more general) and segment (for one diss rate estimate) thing - so no ;) KikiSchulz (talk) 15:44, 9 November 2021 (CET)

Other comment: could we get rid of some 'shear probes' in the subheadings? It is unnecessary, repetative and makes the table of content ugly because it is long. KikiSchulz (talk) 15:44, 9 November 2021 (CET)