Talk:Benchmark datasets for ADCP structure function: Difference between revisions

From Atomix
Created page with "Should we simply include a table here with the relevant information like the shear probe sub group?"
 
mNo edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Should we simply include a table here with the relevant information like the shear probe sub group?
==Comments==
* Should we simply include a table here with the relevant information like the shear probe sub group?
* Please use the four successive tilde ~ to sign off ;) [[User:CynthiaBluteau|CynthiaBluteau]] ([[User talk:CynthiaBluteau|talk]]) 04:27, 11 November 2021 (CET). I've fixed the format of the landing page, including target pages that should be populated eventually like the shear probe (and adv) subgroup.
* I would perhaps separate the benchmark dataset details from this landing page (I presume this is what shear-probe did). It's how the adv one looks like anyways. You could link to the table. I don't think this info is yet available anyways [[User:CynthiaBluteau|CynthiaBluteau]] ([[User talk:CynthiaBluteau|talk]]) 04:27, 11 November 2021 (CET)

Latest revision as of 03:27, 11 November 2021

Comments

  • Should we simply include a table here with the relevant information like the shear probe sub group?
  • Please use the four successive tilde ~ to sign off ;) CynthiaBluteau (talk) 04:27, 11 November 2021 (CET). I've fixed the format of the landing page, including target pages that should be populated eventually like the shear probe (and adv) subgroup.
  • I would perhaps separate the benchmark dataset details from this landing page (I presume this is what shear-probe did). It's how the adv one looks like anyways. You could link to the table. I don't think this info is yet available anyways CynthiaBluteau (talk) 04:27, 11 November 2021 (CET)