Talk:Velocity inertial subrange model: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:46, 11 November 2021

Consider removing the word equilibrium range. This may be confusing to some ppl since the viscous subrange isn't in equilibrium. Perhaps label the 3x subranges (energy or production subrange, inertial, and viscous)? Have the labels match up with the conventions for math vars Nomenclature CynthiaBluteau (talk) 01:30, 11 November 2021 (CET)

Revision as of 00:30, 11 November 2021 view source CynthiaBluteau (talk \| contribs) 2,848 edits mNo edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 21:46, 11 November 2021 view source CynthiaBluteau (talk \| contribs) 2,848 edits mNo edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== ~~Suggestions~~ for figure ==		== Suggestion for figure ==

	* Consider removing the word equilibrium range~~, this is a bit~~ confusing ~~for~~ some ~~users. I don't consider~~ the viscous subrange ~~to be~~ in equilibrium~~, while I often use the work energy-containing range for the lowest frequency~~. ~~I'd just~~ label the 3x subranges, and ~~we can amend~~ the ~~description~~ for ~~the theory of the inertial subrange.~~ [[User:CynthiaBluteau\|CynthiaBluteau]] ([[User talk:CynthiaBluteau\|talk]]) 01:30, 11 November 2021 (CET)		* Consider removing the word equilibrium range. This may be confusing to some ppl since the viscous subrange isn't in equilibrium. Perhaps label the 3x subranges (energy or production subrange, inertial, and viscous)? Have the labels match up with the conventions for math vars [[Nomenclature]] [[User:CynthiaBluteau\|CynthiaBluteau]] ([[User talk:CynthiaBluteau\|talk]]) 01:30, 11 November 2021 (CET)