Rotation of the velocity measurements: Difference between revisions
From Atomix
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|level=level 2 segmented and quality controlled | |level=level 2 segmented and quality controlled | ||
}} | }} | ||
[[ | |||
The [[frame of reference|measurement frame of reference]] varies between set-ups. In some instances, the instrument has an axis aligned with the direction of flow, which is an aligned | |||
= Methods used for rotating into the analysis frame of reference= | = Methods used for rotating into the analysis frame of reference= | ||
{{FontColor|fg=white|bg=red|text=We will update when our final recommendation is set in stone. Also comment about large vertical velocities on sloped bottoms...}} | {{FontColor|fg=white|bg=red|text=We will update when our final recommendation is set in stone. Also, comment about large vertical velocities on sloped bottoms...}} | ||
* Using time-averaged velocities in each segment | * Using time-averaged velocities in each segment | ||
* Principal component analysis | * Principal component analysis | ||
Revision as of 16:01, 2 June 2022
The measurement frame of reference varies between set-ups. In some instances, the instrument has an axis aligned with the direction of flow, which is an aligned
Methods used for rotating into the analysis frame of reference
We will update when our final recommendation is set in stone. Also, comment about large vertical velocities on sloped bottoms...
- Using time-averaged velocities in each segment
- Principal component analysis
