Quality control coding

From Atomix
Revision as of 13:17, 28 May 2021 by Marcus Dengler (talk | contribs) (Created page with " '''Quality control coding''' We suggest to follow [http://www.oceansites.org/ Ocean Sites] for QC coding. The flagging scheme is mostly compatible with the primary level fla...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Quality control coding

We suggest to follow Ocean Sites for QC coding. The flagging scheme is mostly compatible with the primary level flagging suggested by IOC


Flag Meaning Comment
0 unknown No QC was performed.
1 good data All QC tests passed.
2 probably good data Data have failed one or more QC tests but visual examination suggests data is good.
3 potentially correctable bad data These data are not to be used without scientific correction or re-calibration (e.g. uncertain shear sensor sensitivity).
4 bad data Data have failed one or more tests.
5 - Not used
6 - Not used
7 bad data Data were not observed but reported (e.g. instrument target depth.).
8 interpolated value Missing data may be interpolated from neighboring data in space or time.
9 missing value This is a fill value