Talk:Flow chart for shear probes
Step 2: Shall we change the term "Profile"? (--Aleboyer (talk) 14:00, 25 June 2021 (CEST))
Re: Arnaud - I think we settled this section (includes profile but more general) and segment (for one diss rate estimate) thing - so no ;) KikiSchulz (talk) 15:44, 9 November 2021 (CET)
Other comment: could we get rid of some 'shear probes' in the subheadings? It is unnecessary, repetative and makes the table of content ugly because it is long. KikiSchulz (talk) 15:44, 9 November 2021 (CET)Ilker (talk) 16:09, 9 November 2021 (CET)Agreed
Ilker (talk) 16:09, 9 November 2021 (CET) We need a "Determine the temperature of the water" page and a brief description why we need it (calculation of viscosity) and how we measure (FP07- beware drift; precision T sensor, or just assume a reasonable value for the environment).
- I will create page and hope someone fills it with content. KikiSchulz (talk) 22:47, 9 November 2021 (CET)
Coherent-vibration removal: more details can be included, e.g. the need for long segments for cross-spectral analysis and other recommendations Ilker (talk) 21:14, 9 November 2021 (CET)
Let's use numbered list (instead of bullets) for section content. It will be easier to refer to (in text or in an eventual graphics). Also note duplicate similar page and info (despiking parameters in choose parameters and despiking shear probe data in compute...) Ilker (talk) 21:45, 9 November 2021 (CET)
- What to do with duplicate pages? I would advocate to remove them, or fill them with non-duplicate content, but this is quite a big decision to make. KikiSchulz (talk) 22:47, 9 November 2021 (CET)
Another to do: see the extensive material in the "here" page (access from special pages - all pages). We must split these into shorter fundamentals. Ilker (talk) 21:45, 9 November 2021 (CET)
