Talk:Deployment

Suggestions

• I think the environmental conditions, i.e. the scales of turbulence and their time/length scales are important. The epsilon, and the inertial subrange dictate how big your r can be, and also the sampling rate/duration of bursts. CynthiaBluteau (talk) 01:15, 11 November 2021 (CET)

• I agree with Cynthia. I'm transferring Brian's comments here for now, we can build out those pages between now and Warnemund. I also addressed JMM's comment about defining AHRS Yuengdjern (talk) 14:54, 15 November 2021 (CET)

• To do list for Ilker - from Brian: SUGGEST REMOVING BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING PAGES

1. ADCP Hardware
2. ADCP Environment

Yuengdjern (talk) 15:04, 15 November 2021 (CET)

• Other unresolved Comments:

1. (JMM) IS THERE A TYPICAL PINGS PER ENSEMBLE WE CAN RECOMMEND? (i.e. 1 or 2 are all I used at a high flow site)
2. [(JMM) I REWORDED THIS FROM '[math]\displaystyle{ \varepsilon }[/math] estimate observation period', but I don't know if it is any less confisuing]
3. Re: number of profiles: IS THIS ONLY DETERMINED BY THE SAMPLE RATE?]
4. Re bin numbers and sizes: [SHOULD WE QUANTIFY THIS]
5. Re nomenclature table: [IS IT POSSIBLE TO LINK TO APPROPRIATE TABLE?]
6. Re beam configuration: [(JMM) CAN WE BE MORE SPECIFIC HERE? ]]

Yuengdjern (talk) 15:21, 15 November 2021 (CET)

Brian scannell (talk) 12:18, 10 December 2021 (CET) Under motion control, I suggest including a comment about mounting the ADCP in a streamlined buoy or frame designed to maintain steady orientation to the flow. Open frames can oscillate a lot, spherical buoys are better, but a streamlined buoy should be best. Oscillations over the period of the burst result in the background flow seen by a beam varying over the burst, potentially introducing a bias if the background flow is sheared.