Talk:Deployment: Difference between revisions
From Atomix
Yuengdjern (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* I think the environmental conditions, i.e. the scales of turbulence and their time/length scales are important. The epsilon, and the inertial subrange dictate how big your r can be, and also the sampling rate/duration of bursts. [[User:CynthiaBluteau|CynthiaBluteau]] ([[User talk:CynthiaBluteau|talk]]) 01:15, 11 November 2021 (CET) | * I think the environmental conditions, i.e. the scales of turbulence and their time/length scales are important. The epsilon, and the inertial subrange dictate how big your r can be, and also the sampling rate/duration of bursts. [[User:CynthiaBluteau|CynthiaBluteau]] ([[User talk:CynthiaBluteau|talk]]) 01:15, 11 November 2021 (CET) | ||
* I agree with Cynthia. I'm transferring Brian's comments here for now, we can build out those pages between now and | * I agree with Cynthia. I'm transferring Brian's comments here for now, we can build out those pages between now and Warnemund. I also addressed JMM's comment about defining AHRS [[User:Yuengdjern|Yuengdjern]] ([[User talk:Yuengdjern|talk]]) 14:54, 15 November 2021 (CET) | ||
* To do list for Ilker - from Brian: SUGGEST REMOVING BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING PAGES''' | * To do list for Ilker - from Brian: SUGGEST REMOVING BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING PAGES''' | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
# [[ADCP Environment]] | # [[ADCP Environment]] | ||
[[User:Yuengdjern|Yuengdjern]] ([[User talk:Yuengdjern|talk]]) 15:04, 15 November 2021 (CET) | [[User:Yuengdjern|Yuengdjern]] ([[User talk:Yuengdjern|talk]]) 15:04, 15 November 2021 (CET) | ||
* Other unresolved Comments: | |||
# (JMM) IS THERE A TYPICAL PINGS PER ENSEMBLE WE CAN RECOMMEND? (i.e. 1 or 2 are all I used at a high flow site) | |||
# [(JMM) I REWORDED THIS FROM '<math>\varepsilon</math> estimate observation period', but I don't know if it is any less confisuing] | |||
# Re: number of profiles: IS THIS ONLY DETERMINED BY THE SAMPLE RATE?] | |||
# Re bin numbers and sizes: [SHOULD WE QUANTIFY THIS] | |||
# Re nomenclature table: [IS IT POSSIBLE TO LINK TO APPROPRIATE TABLE?] | |||
# Re beam configuration: [(JMM) CAN WE BE MORE SPECIFIC HERE? ]] | |||
[[User:Yuengdjern|Yuengdjern]] ([[User talk:Yuengdjern|talk]]) 15:21, 15 November 2021 (CET) | |||
[[User:Brian scannell|Brian scannell]] ([[User talk:Brian scannell|talk]]) 12:18, 10 December 2021 (CET) Under motion control, I suggest including a comment about mounting the ADCP in a streamlined buoy or frame designed to maintain steady orientation to the flow. Open frames can oscillate a lot, spherical buoys are better, but a streamlined buoy should be best. Oscillations over the period of the burst result in the background flow seen by a beam varying over the burst, potentially introducing a bias if the background flow is sheared. | |||
Latest revision as of 11:18, 10 December 2021
Suggestions
- I think the environmental conditions, i.e. the scales of turbulence and their time/length scales are important. The epsilon, and the inertial subrange dictate how big your r can be, and also the sampling rate/duration of bursts. CynthiaBluteau (talk) 01:15, 11 November 2021 (CET)
- I agree with Cynthia. I'm transferring Brian's comments here for now, we can build out those pages between now and Warnemund. I also addressed JMM's comment about defining AHRS Yuengdjern (talk) 14:54, 15 November 2021 (CET)
- To do list for Ilker - from Brian: SUGGEST REMOVING BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING PAGES
Yuengdjern (talk) 15:04, 15 November 2021 (CET)
- Other unresolved Comments:
- (JMM) IS THERE A TYPICAL PINGS PER ENSEMBLE WE CAN RECOMMEND? (i.e. 1 or 2 are all I used at a high flow site)
- [(JMM) I REWORDED THIS FROM '[math]\displaystyle{ \varepsilon }[/math] estimate observation period', but I don't know if it is any less confisuing]
- Re: number of profiles: IS THIS ONLY DETERMINED BY THE SAMPLE RATE?]
- Re bin numbers and sizes: [SHOULD WE QUANTIFY THIS]
- Re nomenclature table: [IS IT POSSIBLE TO LINK TO APPROPRIATE TABLE?]
- Re beam configuration: [(JMM) CAN WE BE MORE SPECIFIC HERE? ]]
Yuengdjern (talk) 15:21, 15 November 2021 (CET)
Brian scannell (talk) 12:18, 10 December 2021 (CET) Under motion control, I suggest including a comment about mounting the ADCP in a streamlined buoy or frame designed to maintain steady orientation to the flow. Open frames can oscillate a lot, spherical buoys are better, but a streamlined buoy should be best. Oscillations over the period of the burst result in the background flow seen by a beam varying over the burst, potentially introducing a bias if the background flow is sheared.
