Talk:Deployment: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:21, 15 November 2021

I think the environmental conditions, i.e. the scales of turbulence and their time/length scales are important. The epsilon, and the inertial subrange dictate how big your r can be, and also the sampling rate/duration of bursts. CynthiaBluteau (talk) 01:15, 11 November 2021 (CET)

I agree with Cynthia. I'm transferring Brian's comments here for now, we can build out those pages between now and Warnemunde Yuengdjern (talk) 14:54, 15 November 2021 (CET)

Yuengdjern (talk) 15:04, 15 November 2021 (CET)

(JMM) IS THERE A TYPICAL PINGS PER ENSEMBLE WE CAN RECOMMEND? (i.e. 1 or 2 are all I used at a high flow site)
[(JMM) I REWORDED THIS FROM '[math]\displaystyle{ \varepsilon }[/math] estimate observation period', but I don't know if it is any less confisuing]
Re: number of profiles: IS THIS ONLY DETERMINED BY THE SAMPLE RATE?]
Re bin numbers and sizes: [SHOULD WE QUANTIFY THIS]
Re nomenclature table: [IS IT POSSIBLE TO LINK TO APPROPRIATE TABLE?]
Re beam configuration: [(JMM) CAN WE BE MORE SPECIFIC HERE? ]]
Re AHRS: [(JMM) WHAT IS THIS ACRONYM]

Yuengdjern (talk) 15:21, 15 November 2021 (CET)

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 # [[ADCP Environment]]
 [[User:Yuengdjern|Yuengdjern]] ([[User talk:Yuengdjern|talk]]) 15:04, 15 November 2021 (CET)
+* Other Comments:
+#  (JMM) IS THERE A TYPICAL PINGS PER ENSEMBLE WE CAN RECOMMEND? (i.e. 1 or 2 are all I used at a high flow site)
+#  [(JMM) I REWORDED THIS FROM '<math>\varepsilon</math> estimate observation period', but I don't know if it is any less confisuing]
+# Re: number of profiles: IS THIS ONLY DETERMINED BY THE SAMPLE RATE?]
+# Re bin numbers and sizes: [SHOULD WE QUANTIFY THIS]
+# Re nomenclature table: [IS IT POSSIBLE TO LINK TO APPROPRIATE TABLE?]
+# Re beam configuration: [(JMM) CAN WE BE MORE SPECIFIC HERE? ]]
+# Re AHRS: [(JMM) WHAT IS THIS ACRONYM]
+[[User:Yuengdjern|Yuengdjern]] ([[User talk:Yuengdjern|talk]]) 15:21, 15 November 2021 (CET)