Raw data review (QA1): Difference between revisions

From Atomix
Yuengdjern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Yuengdjern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 37: Line 37:
</div>
</div>
-----
-----
Next step: [[ ]]<br></br>
Next step: [[Processing your ADCP data using structure function techniques | Compute structure functions and dissipation estimates]]<br></br>
Previous step: [[ Deployment ]] <br></br>
Previous step: [[ Deployment ]] <br></br>
Return to [[ADCP structure function flow chart| ADCP Flow Chart front page]]
Return to [[ADCP structure function flow chart| ADCP Flow Chart front page]]

Revision as of 14:44, 15 November 2021

The objective of the raw data review is to ensure that the velocity data used for the calculation of the structure functions are of good quality before proceeding with the turbulence analysis. Bad data are typically identified from the velocity data themselves and other ancillary data (e.g. correlations). It is recommended that velocity data should be flagged if the following are observed:

Data quality is poor

Unrealistic velocity values

Significant instrument motion and orientation

There is wave or periodic motion

Velocity shear is too large

Stationary assumption may be violated

Stratification is too large


Next step: Compute structure functions and dissipation estimates

Previous step: Deployment

Return to ADCP Flow Chart front page