Raw data review (QA1): Difference between revisions
From Atomix
Yuengdjern (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Yuengdjern (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
#* Velocities outside expected distribution | #* Velocities outside expected distribution | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
= Significant instrument motion and orientation = | == Significant instrument motion and orientation == | ||
<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" id="motion" data-collapsetext="Collapse" data-expandtext="Expand"> | <div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" id="motion" data-collapsetext="Collapse" data-expandtext="Expand"> | ||
#* High variability in pitch, heading and roll | #* High variability in pitch, heading and roll |
Revision as of 09:40, 16 November 2021
The objective of the raw data review is to ensure that the velocity data used for the calculation of the structure functions are of good quality before proceeding with the turbulence analysis. Bad data are typically identified from the velocity data themselves and other ancillary data (e.g. correlations). It is recommended that velocity data should be flagged if the following are observed:
Data quality is poor
Unrealistic velocity values
Significant instrument motion and orientation
There is wave or periodic motion
Velocity shear is too large
Stationary assumption may be violated
Stratification is too large
Next step: Compute structure functions and dissipation estimates
Previous step: Deployment
Return to ADCP Flow Chart front page