The bias induced by the Goodman algorithm: Difference between revisions
From Atomix
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|doi= 10.1175/JTECH1889.1 | |doi= 10.1175/JTECH1889.1 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
vibration-coherent corrections algorithm is corrected by dividing the spectrum by <math>1-\frac{1.02N_v}{N_f}</math> where <math>N_v</math> is the number of signals that are used to remove coherent | vibration-coherent corrections algorithm is corrected by dividing the spectrum by <math>1-\frac{1.02N_v}{N_f}</math> where <math>N_v</math> is the number of signals that are used to remove coherent noise in the shear-probe signals and <math>N_f</math> is the number of fft-segments that are used to estimate the shear spectrum | ||
<ref name="luecketal2022">{{Cite journal | <ref name="luecketal2022">{{Cite journal | ||
|authors= R. G. Lueck, D. MacIntyre, and J. MacMillan | |authors= R. G. Lueck, D. MacIntyre, and J. MacMillan | ||
Revision as of 22:11, 19 November 2021
The bias induced by the Goodman routine [1] vibration-coherent corrections algorithm is corrected by dividing the spectrum by <math>1-\frac{1.02N_v}{N_f}</math> where <math>N_v</math> is the number of signals that are used to remove coherent noise in the shear-probe signals and <math>N_f</math> is the number of fft-segments that are used to estimate the shear spectrum [2].
References
- ↑ {{#arraymap:L. Goodman, E. Levine and R. Lueck|,|x|x|, |and}}. 2006. On measuring the terms of the turbulent kinetic energy budget from an AUV. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.. doi:10.1175/JTECH1889.1
- ↑ {{#arraymap:R. G. Lueck, D. MacIntyre, and J. MacMillan|,|x|x|, |and}}. 2022. The bias in coherent noise removal. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.. doi:TBD
return to Flow chart for shear probes
