Tentative benchmarks for shear probes: Difference between revisions
From Atomix
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
! Volunteer testers | ! Volunteer testers | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | VMP250_TidalChannel_024_csRGL_2022-03-03 | ||
| Ship | | Ship | ||
| VMP-500 | | VMP-500 | ||
| Haro Strait | | Haro Strait | ||
| Lueck | | Lueck | ||
| Intense turbulence. | | Intense turbulence. | Large up/down drafts affecting fall rate; this one processed using a constant speed of <math>0.75\, \mathrm{m\,s^{-1}}</math>; some estimates require fitting to the inertial subrange. | ||
| | |||
|- | |||
| VMP250_TidalChannel_024_RGL_2022-03-03 | |||
| Ship | |||
| VMP-500 | |||
| Haro Strait | |||
| Lueck | |||
| Intense turbulence. | Large up/down drafts affecting fall rate; this one processed using a speed equal to <math>\mathrm{d}P/\mathrm{d}t</math>; some estimates require fitting to the inertial subrange. | |||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 32: | Line 40: | ||
| Lueck | | Lueck | ||
| Large up/down drafts affecting fall rate; require fitting to intertial subrange | | Large up/down drafts affecting fall rate; require fitting to intertial subrange | ||
| Intense turbulence. Two sections: one good one with glithces | |||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
Revision as of 18:30, 3 March 2022
Please follow the Filename convention for testing if changing the filename prefix supplied in this table.
File name when testing
FilenamePrefix_II_YYYYMMDD.nc where:
- II is your initials (use as many letters as needed)
- YYYYMMDD is the year, month and date using the ISO standard date.
| Filename Prefix | Platform | Instrument | Region | PI (ATOMIX) | Comment | Volunteer testers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VMP250_TidalChannel_024_csRGL_2022-03-03 | Ship | VMP-500 | Haro Strait | Lueck | Large up/down drafts affecting fall rate; this one processed using a constant speed of [math]\displaystyle{ 0.75\, \mathrm{m\,s^{-1}} }[/math]; some estimates require fitting to the inertial subrange. | ||
| VMP250_TidalChannel_024_RGL_2022-03-03 | Ship | VMP-500 | Haro Strait | Lueck | Large up/down drafts affecting fall rate; this one processed using a speed equal to [math]\displaystyle{ \mathrm{d}P/\mathrm{d}t }[/math]; some estimates require fitting to the inertial subrange. | ||
| VMP_AglhasCurrent | Ship | VMP-500 | Agulhas Current | Lueck | Large up/down drafts affecting fall rate; require fitting to intertial subrange | Intense turbulence. Two sections: one good one with glithces | |
| EPSILOMETER_RockallTrough | Ship | Epsilometer | Rockall Trough | Le Boyer | Strong turbulence in a canyon | ||
| AUV_MicroRider_BarentsSea | AUV | MicroRider | Barents Sea (Arctic) | Fer | Propelled vehicle | ||
| Glider_MicroRider_BarentsSea | Glider | MicroRider | Barents Sea (Arctic) | Fer | |||
| VMP6000_OgasawaraRidge | Ship | VMP-6000 | Ogasawara Ridge (western Pacific) | Hibiya | Untethered; >3000 m profile | ||
| Glider_MicroRider_Shelf_Peru | Glider | MicroRider |
Continental slope off Peru, eastern tropical Pacific | Dengler | Electromagnetic current meter; strong tidal currents | ||
| MSS_BalticSea | Ship | MSS | Baltic Sea | Holtermann | One good profile, one corrupted by jellyfish | ||
| MSS_ArcticOcean | Ice | MSS | Arctic Ocean | Meyer | |||
| VMP6000_NorwegianSea | Ship | VMP-6000 | Norwegian Sea | Fer | In a strong & deep anticyclone, full depth (>3000 m) | ||
| Ice_VMP250upriser_ArcticOcean | Ice | VMP-250 upriser | Arctic Ocean | Fer | One good and bad profile to highlight challenges with an upriser | ||
| Moored_MicroRider_TidalChannel | Mooring | MicroRider | Lueck | Time series from a fixed point; strong tidal flow |
return to Shear probes
