Segmenting datasets: Difference between revisions

From Atomix
mNo edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:
* continuously, or in such long bursts that they can be considered continuous
* continuously, or in such long bursts that they can be considered continuous
* short bursts that are typically  at most 2-3x the expected largest [[Time and length scales of turbulence|turbulence time scales]] (e.g., 10 min in ocean environments)
* short bursts that are typically  at most 2-3x the expected largest [[Time and length scales of turbulence|turbulence time scales]] (e.g., 10 min in ocean environments)
 
This segmenting step dictates the minimum burst duration when setting up your equipment. The act of chopping a time series into smaller subsets, i.e., segments, is effectively a form of low-pass (box-car) filtering. How to [[Segmenting datasets|segment]] the time series is usually a more important consideration than [[Detrending time series|detrending time series]] since estimating <math>\varepsilon</math> relies on resolving the [[Velocity inertial subrange|inertial subrange]].  
The act of chopping a time series into smaller subsets, i.e., segments, is effectively a form of low-pass (box-car) filtering. Hence,  when estimating <math>\varepsilon</math>  how  to [[Segmenting datasets|segment]] the time series is usually a more important consideration than [[Detrending time series|detrending time series]]. This segmenting step dictates the minimum burst duration when setting-up your equipment.


<div><ul>  
<div><ul>  
Line 24: Line 23:
<li style="display: inline-block; vertical-align: top;"> [[File:Short_spectra.png|thumb|none|350px|Example velocity spectra of the short 512 s of records before and after different detrending techniques applied to the original 6h  time series. The impact of the detrending method can be seen at the lowest frequencies only]] </li>
<li style="display: inline-block; vertical-align: top;"> [[File:Short_spectra.png|thumb|none|350px|Example velocity spectra of the short 512 s of records before and after different detrending techniques applied to the original 6h  time series. The impact of the detrending method can be seen at the lowest frequencies only]] </li>
</ul></div>
</ul></div>


==Notes==
==Notes==

Revision as of 14:28, 30 November 2021

Once the raw observations have been quality-controlled, then you must split the time series into shorter segments by considering:

Measured velocities at 4 Hz from an Acoustic-Doppler Velocimeters have been detrended using three different techniques. Empirical modal decomposition (EMD) [1], linear trend, and a 2nd order low-pass Butterworth filter. A cut-off period of 10 min was targeted by both the filter and EMD

Application to measured velocities

Measurements are typically collected in the following two ways:

  • continuously, or in such long bursts that they can be considered continuous
  • short bursts that are typically at most 2-3x the expected largest turbulence time scales (e.g., 10 min in ocean environments)

This segmenting step dictates the minimum burst duration when setting up your equipment. The act of chopping a time series into smaller subsets, i.e., segments, is effectively a form of low-pass (box-car) filtering. How to segment the time series is usually a more important consideration than detrending time series since estimating ε relies on resolving the inertial subrange.

  • Zoom of the first 512 s of the measured velocities shown above including the same trends
  • Example velocity spectra of the short 512 s of records before and after different detrending techniques applied to the original 6h time series. The impact of the detrending method can be seen at the lowest frequencies only

Notes

  1. {{#arraymap:Zhaohua Wu, Norden E. Huang, Steven R. Long, and Chung-Kang Peng|,|x|x|, |and}}. 2007. On the trend, detrending, and variability of nonlinear and nonstationary time series. PNAS. doi:10.1073/pnas.0701020104