Segmenting datasets: Difference between revisions
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
{{FontColor|fg=white|bg=red|text= include example data in plot highlighting low and high epsilon, and different speeds leading to much shorter and longer segmenting periods}} | {{FontColor|fg=white|bg=red|text= include example data in plot highlighting low and high epsilon, and different speeds leading to much shorter and longer segmenting periods}} | ||
[[File: | [[File:Segment_anisotropy.png|center|thumbnail|600px|Example theoretical velocity spectra for different <math>\varepsilon</math>. The inertial subrange extends to a smaller wavenumber as <math>\varepsilon</math> increases. The lowest frequency resolved by a spectra depends on the fft-length used when computing the spectra. The example shown is from a dataset with fast speeds and large <math>\varepsilon</math>, enabling to use of relatively short segments (128s) to estimate the spectra from fft-length of 32 s (2048 samples @ 64 Hz)]] | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== |
Revision as of 16:37, 5 July 2022
Once the raw observations have been quality-controlled, then you must split the time series into shorter segments by considering:
- Time and length scales of turbulence
- Stationarity of the segment and Taylor's frozen turbulence hypothesis
- Statistical significance of the resulting spectra
Considerations
Measurements are typically collected in the following two ways:
- continuously, or in such long bursts that they can be considered continuous
- short bursts that are typically at most 2-3x the expected largest turbulence time scales (e.g., 10 min in ocean environments)
This segmenting step dictates the minimum burst duration when setting up your equipment. The act of chopping a time series into smaller subsets, i.e., segments, is effectively a form of low-pass (box-car) filtering. How to segment the time series is usually a more important consideration than detrending the time series since estimating [math]\displaystyle{ \varepsilon }[/math] relies on resolving the inertial subrange in the final spectra computed over each segment.
Trade-offs
The shorter the segment, the higher the temporal resolution of the final [math]\displaystyle{ \varepsilon }[/math] time series and the more likely the segment will be stationary. However, the spectrum's lowest resolved frequency and frequency resolution depends on the duration of the signal used to construct the spectrum. Therefore, the segment must remain sufficiently long such that the lowest wavenumber (frequencies) of the inertial subrange are retained by the spectra. This is particularly important when measurement noise drowns the highest wavenumber (frequencies) of the inertial subrange. Thus, using too short segments may inadvertently render the resulting spectra unusable for deriving [math]\displaystyle{ \varepsilon }[/math] from the inertial subrange by virtue of no longer resolving this subrange.
Rules of thumb
A good rule of thumb for tidally-influenced environments is 5 to 15 min segments. include example data in plot highlighting low and high epsilon, and different speeds leading to much shorter and longer segmenting periods
Notes
Return to Preparing_quality-controlled_velocities